responding to those who voted for Trump

Share Button

I’ve been thinking a lot about the questions of what it means to vote for Trump and who the Trump supporters are. I’ve seen lots of posts about how Trump won because he spoke to the working class, and the working class wants change and human dignity. There are some who say that making this about race and homophobia is a mistake… that it is an attempt to tarnish the good people who voted for Trump, to write them off as “deplorables” rather than to hear their legitimate concerns. On the other hand, we now have Christian supremists and probably white surpremists working in the white house. Can we really expect people to say, “aww, ya, I guess your economic straights justified voting that guy in…. I know you’re a nice person at heart.” I read people saying that people shouldn’t view Trump voters as ignorant. Yet they’ve voted for a guy who basically promised them unicorns with no idea even of how the white house works. How can that be anything but ignorance?

Yet then there is that question of how do people turn others into allies. Does calling out racism push others into defensiveness and create more racism? (Shouldn’t people have a responsibility to not be racist, regardless of whether they were insulted someone called them racist?) I see all these questions being asked by people struggling to cope with the election. Is it just liberal guilt run amok, that people struggle so much with this? I’m envious, in a way, of those who say clear cut look, this Trump is insane, we can’t act as though this was a normal election where we have to respect differences of opinions.

How do we love someone who does something that hurts us? How do we interact with people who rejoice in something that brings us harm?

I know one of the responses to this would be to say “oh, Trump isn’t really harming people…” I’m sure that those who have been attacked by Trump supporters would disagree. Trump’s very election harms people, in that it has communicated the message that even if a man is accused by multiple people for sexual assault, he’s still qualified. It harms people in that it sends the message that it is ok to voice racist arguments. Those are two ways it harms people even before inauguration. We have yet to see what harm could come about after he actually takes power, but I’m not comforted by those that say “oh, he’s not really as bad as he sounds.” So far he has proven to be exactly as unprepared for being a president as he sounded and he is surrounding himself by incredibly awful, hateful people. So if you want to tell me he’s not really harming anyone…. good luck.

Back to the original issue, I was thinking about the show The View. I’ve only watched it once, in a doctor’s waiting room. It was right after an attack on a black church in the States, and the panelists were talking about whether America is racist. One white woman on the show said she knows Americans aren’t racists because racists are bad people, and Americans are good. Americans are good. Her logic was appalling, but I think about it now as I read things with people struggling to make sense of the election. I wonder how much the people denying that voting for Trump is a vote for racism, sexism and homophobia are doing so out of that same sort of logic. They believe America is good and are trying to find a way to keep that belief. If America is good, and so many Americans voted for Trump, then voting for Trump must be good too, somehow. It is dangerous flawed logic to start on the premise that America is good and work from there.

The call to not be divisive, to not portray Trump voters as anything but good people making their own personal best choices, ends up trying to brush aside and ignore the fact those personal choices are hurting others. Who to vote for is not the same as what to order in a restaurant or what style of peanut butter you want. It has consequences beyond the individual person. We can’t paint over the damage done (and damage likely to happen) to prevent any blame from being placed on those who voted for him. Americans might be good people, but an awful lot of them did a bad thing, and as much as they might try to say they personally aren’t racist, they were willing to support racists. Where the difference is between racists and their supporters are, I do not know.

We cannot wish Trump voters out of existence. Painting them as racist is divisive. Pretending that race did not effect things is dangerous, wishful thinking. How do you handle the issue?

This post was inspired by this facebook picture: https://www.facebook.com/abra.mims/posts/10157628077775567

Share Button

One thought on “responding to those who voted for Trump

  1. I don’t vote. I abstain from voting for several reasons, the most important being that I don’t give my consent to be ruled by an oligarchy. I mention that first so that I can establish a slightly objective viewpoint (acknowledging that no viewpoint is going to be truly objective).

    The American people were given horrendous choices in this election, really unthinkable choices. Even the third party candidates were dismal, to put it mildly. You say that the people who voted for Trump did a bad thing, and perhaps they did, but surely the people who voted for Clinton also did a bad thing.

    From my vantage point, the worst thing Trump said was that he would kill innocents in a combat situation, that he would use his force to make the military commit these murders. Yes, to my mind, this is far worse rhetoric than threatening to deport illegal immigrants who have been involved in criminal activity. Threatening war crimes is abominable.

    However, actually committing war crimes is a worse thing still, worse than just threatening to commit them. Clinton is directly responsible for death and destruction in Libya, Haiti, Syria, and the arming of ISIS with military grade weapons paid for by the American taxpayers. She enabled the voter fraud which took place in Haiti, as well as the election fraud that took place in her own party. She destroyed untold numbers of government documents, presumably to destroy evidence of her crimes. She browbeat the victims of sexual assault, whose victimization came at the hands of her own husband. That is unfortunately, only the tip of the iceberg.
    Could it ever be a good thing to vote for a person who has unapologetically destroyed whole countries and the innocents within them (countries, by the way, in which most of the people are people of color), who further victimizes victims of sexual assault and prevents them from getting justice, who enables election fraud without a pang of conscience, as long as her goals are served?

    That is why I don’t understand the blame going around. Everyone was served the same dish. The choice was not between peanut butter or jelly but between a missile and a torpedo. Death and destruction or destruction and death.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*